Non-state actor

Board of Peace

International bodies Transitional administration for Gaza under resolution 2803

Last reviewed
2026-10-11

AssessmentModerate confidence

Figures carry their own uncertainty. Population, economic and military-spending data in wartime are estimates, often contested; every figure below shows its as-of date and a confidence grade, and leadership positions reflect the last review date and change without notice.

What this actor is

The Board of Peace is the transitional administration for Gaza that resolution 2803, adopted on 17 November 2025 by 13 votes to none with China and Russia abstaining, welcomed as having "international legal personality". Chaired by the US president, it coordinates redevelopment and funding until the Palestinian Authority has completed its reform programme, may establish operational entities for governance, reconstruction, services and movement, and is authorised with an International Stabilization Force until 31 December 2027, reporting to the Council every six months. Its structure was announced on 16 January 2026: a founding Executive Board, a Gaza Executive Board, Nickolay Mladenov as High Representative for Gaza and a Palestinian technocratic committee chaired by Ali Sha'ath. By October 2026 the committee was still based in Cairo, the force had not deployed inside Gaza, and the Board's 15-point roadmap of 30 July 2026 had been approved by Hamas but not signed by Israel.

Confidence: Moderate Reviewed 2026-10-11

AuthorisationBoard and international security presence authorised until 31 December 2027, subject to further Council action (OP8); written report every six months (OP10)As of 2025-11-17 · Confidence: High The resolution does not invoke Chapter VII, does not create a UN operation and sets no disarmament timetable. Sources: UN Security Council resolutions, Secretary-General reports and meeting records (Levant)↗
Technocratic committeeFormed January 2026, first meeting in Cairo on 15 January; "has not yet been able to enter Gaza" (Board report, May 2026); still in Cairo in October 2026As of 2026-10 · Confidence: High Sources: UN Security Council resolutions, Secretary-General reports and meeting records (Levant)↗ · US government statements and documents on Israel, Gaza and Lebanon · Security Council Report — monthly forecasts↗
Stabilization forceUnder US unified command; founding contributors Albania, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kosovo and Morocco signed on 19 February 2026; not deployed inside GazaAs of 2026-10-01 · Confidence: High Non-deployment confirmed by the Board's report to 14 May and by Security Council Report on 1 October. Pledges are not presence. Sources: UN Security Council resolutions, Secretary-General reports and meeting records (Levant)↗ · Security Council Report — monthly forecasts↗
Reconstruction finance$17bn pledged, as reported by the Board; a Gaza Reconstruction and Development Fund (GRAD) with the World Bank as limited trusteeAs of 2026-05-15 · Confidence: Moderate The Board's own figures (S/2026/418). Disbursement is not reported. Sources: UN Security Council resolutions, Secretary-General reports and meeting records (Levant)↗

The roadmap and its verification

The roadmap of 30 July 2026, developed by the guarantors — Egypt, Qatar, Türkiye and the United States — with the High Representative, sets an International Verification Committee of guarantor, Board and force representatives to certify each stage, links decommissioning to "an Israeli withdrawal, in phases", and starts a 14-day clock for the Phase 2 timetable only once all parties approve it. Hamas approved it; Israel is not a signatory, and no document shows the committee constituted.

Sources: US government statements and documents on Israel, Gaza and Lebanon · UN Security Council resolutions, Secretary-General reports and meeting records (Levant)↗ · Security Council Report — monthly forecasts↗

Constraints

The Board's first report names "Hamas' refusal to accept verified decommissioning" as the principal obstacle and records violations on a "near daily basis". Its operational entities and the force depend on voluntary contributions, and the Israeli withdrawal it is meant to oversee is tied by the resolution to milestones agreed among the IDF, the force, the guarantors and the United States.

Sources: UN Security Council resolutions, Secretary-General reports and meeting records (Levant)↗

Position in the system

The Board is the hub every Gaza mechanism connects to — the committee, the force, the fund and, through the High Representative, the parties — and it holds authority without presence inside the Strip. Its second report to the Council is due around mid-November 2026.

Sources: UN Security Council resolutions, Secretary-General reports and meeting records (Levant)↗

Not published for Board of PeacePosture (objectives, constraints, leverage)

Confidence: Moderate The resolution, the White House statement, the Board's report and the roadmap are read in primary form. The Board's own figures (aid volumes, pledges) are its own account; implementation after May 2026 rests on Security Council Report and press. Sources: UN Security Council resolutions, Secretary-General reports and meeting records (Levant)↗ · US government statements and documents on Israel, Gaza and Lebanon · Security Council Report — monthly forecasts↗ Methodology Corrections Open in Explore

Last reviewed — 2026-10-11

Watch questions this actor bears on

Standing analytical questions whose evidence runs through this actor, each with its latest review. Derived from the Watch object, never restated here.

Connected records

9 records that Board of Peace names, or that name it — every one an explicit reference in a published record, nothing inferred from subject matter.