Force Atlas

All-out Defense Mobilization Agency

TAIWAN · REPUBLIC OF CHINA ARMED FORCES · BRANCH

Part of Republic of China Armed Forces

Taiwan / ROC Active
Assessed as of
2026-09
Reviewed
2026-09-09
Confidence
moderate
  • Institutional emblem · official · carried by Republic of China Armed Forces
  • State affiliation · Taiwan
  • Vigil category device · not official insignia
Identity provenance

Institutional emblem: Flag of the Ministry of National Defense — the ministry these forces sit under — carried by Republic of China Armed Forces, not issued to this record. THE MINISTRY'S FLAG, NOT THE ARMED FORCES' OWN, and the label says so: the Republic of China Armed Forces are under civilian control through the Ministry of National Defense, and the ministry's flag is the institutional identity the whole structure sits beneath. The services that have flags of their own author them and override this; the ones that do not inherit it, which is the correct reading of what they are. WHAT CHANGED THE EARLIER REFUSAL. The Taiwan pass refused every ROC mark on the SYMBOL test — the ROC Copyright Act names no exclusion for military symbols, so no supplied file could clear. That reasoning was about the FILE'S LICENCE and was applied to a question it does not reach: this Commons file is tagged PUBLIC DOMAIN in its own right, with the ROC Ministry of National Defence recorded as the author of the original, so there is no licence to satisfy and no attribution or share-alike obligation attaches. FILE: Wikimedia Commons "ROC Ministry of National Defense Flag.svg", public domain. Optimised for web display — editor metadata removed and coordinate precision reduced to two decimals on a 1000-unit canvas; no path, colour, proportion or viewBox altered.

State affiliation: Taiwan.

The smaller square mark is a Vigil category device, drawn from this record’s own domain, echelon and role — not an official insignia.

In brief

The body responsible for Taiwan's reserve mobilisation and civil-defence coordination — the institutional bridge between the armed forces and societal resilience.

Scope
Structure, role, lineage and links. 1 subordinate record published.
Subordination
Subordination confirmed
Sources
4 on the record
Record state
Partial
Broad area of activity
Taiwan and its administered territories, working through municipal and county governments
Notable history
Authorised by the Legislative Yuan in May 2021, inaugurated on 30 December 2021 and formally established on 1 January 2022, by merging the All-out Defense Mobilization Office with the Armed Forces Reserve Command. The merger is the substance of the reform rather than an administrative tidy-up: it put reserve mobilisation, materiel mobilisation and civil-defence coordination under one agency reporting to the Ministry of National Defense, where they had previously been split between a policy office and a troop command. The Armed Forces Reserve Command continues as an affiliated organisation beneath it. Four divisions carry the work — Manpower Mobilization, Materials Mobilization, Mobilization Management and Mobilization Integration — and the last of those names the problem the agency exists to solve, which is that mobilisation in Taiwan runs through civilian local government as much as through military channels.
Strengths
Its authority spans the civil–military boundary, which is where Taiwanese resilience planning actually sits: the same agency publishes the public civil-defence handbook, coordinates the annual Urban Resilience exercises with municipal and county governments, and administers reserve call-ups. Three editions of the handbook have been issued since 2022, the most recent in September 2025 with a clearer focus on wartime scenarios than its predecessor. The 2026 Urban Resilience exercise cycle was run with eleven municipal and county governments from April onward, and its mobile-network throttling component in August 2026 was the first population-scale continuity test of its kind conducted by any democracy.
Limitations
An agency can standardise a training requirement and cannot by itself produce readiness. The 2026 reform raised education mobilisation call-ups to a uniform fourteen days, replacing a five-to-seven-day programme and removing the double-credit arrangement that had softened the longer format since it was piloted in 2022, and the ministry reports a 93 per cent rate of matching reservists to their original posts. Those are inputs and administrative outcomes. Whether the resulting reserve system performs is contested among Taiwan's own analysts, surveys consistently show modest personal preparedness, and Vigil publishes no assessment of reserve readiness, no strengths and no mobilisation timelines. A training standard, an exercise and a demonstrated capability are three different things and this record keeps them apart.

Subordinate formations

Rows are layout only — position and order carry no hierarchy, importance, sequence or strength. Every record shown is an immediate subordinate of the selected organisation.

View the full structure →

Related organisations

  • ROC Army Institutionally linked to · moderate confidence

    Reserve mobilisation is executed principally through army structures.

Lineage & institutional history

Formed 2022

Predecessors: All-out Defense Mobilization Office

Campaigns

Campaigns naming this organisation as a participant. The campaign record owns the relationship and grades it; this list is computed.

  • Defence reform and civil resilience programme Primary force · Since 2022 · moderate confidence · as of 2026-06

    The reserve and mobilisation reorganisation is the programme's least visible and most structurally significant component.

Key events

June 2026moderate confidence

Reserve call-ups standardised at fourteen days

Taiwan's defence ministry confirms in June 2026 that all education mobilisation call-ups are standardised at fourteen days, replacing the previous five-to-seven-day programme and removing the double-credit arrangement that had softened the fourteen-day format since it was piloted in 2022. The ministry reports a 93 per cent match rate for the policy of returning reservists to their original posts, allowing training in fixed groups, and states an intention to expand realistic training and to revise regulations covering female reservists. Reserve mobilisation is administered by the All-Out Defense Mobilization Agency, formed on 1 January 2022 by merging the mobilisation office with the Armed Forces Reserve Command.

14 August 2026moderate confidence

Han Kuang 42 closes after ten days

Taiwan's 42nd Han Kuang exercise concluded on 14 August 2026 at Bo'ai Camp in Taipei, ten days after it began on 5 August, with the chief of the general staff, service chiefs and regional commanders present. Defence Minister Wellington Koo said the exercise had run with fully operational command centres at every level for the first time and had continued the unscripted format, with units responding to developing orders rather than a rehearsed sequence; he praised participating troops and told officers to address the problems the exercise had identified. Reporting describes it as Taiwan's largest military exercise since 1984, mobilising more than 20,000 reservists. Its components across the ten days included the two mobile-network throttling windows recorded separately here, dispersal of weapons production and mobilisation of civilian manufacturing, urban resilience training run inside the military exercise, and the first joint navy–coast guard anti-blockade drill. China's defence ministry issued its first official comment on the exercise on its final day, spokesperson Chen Xi calling it a posturing, wasteful charade and accusing the governing party of stoking war panic.

Assessed as of — 2026-09 Last reviewed — 2026-09-09

See this force in the structure Interactive: select this record and follow what connects to it.

Watch questions this formation bears on

Standing analytical questions whose evidence runs through this formation, each with its latest review. Derived from the Watch object, never restated here.

Connected records

4 records that this organisation names, or that name it — every one an explicit reference in a published record, nothing inferred from subject matter.

Commanded or sponsored by1

Actor records that name this organisation.

Participates in1

Campaigns whose participant list names this organisation.

Named in these events2

Dated events recording this organisation as a participant, with the role each event states.