The alliance that puts a Taiwan contingency inside Japanese territory before it is a Japanese decision.
Relationships
The standing arrangements between the actors in this module, each as a record with its own dates, sources and confidence: what the arrangement covers, when it began, what last changed it, and what remains unclear. Vigil publishes no measure of how strong or how hostile a relationship is — the description and its evidence are the record.
Everything in this module14 analytical layers in this conflict
Understand
Effects & resilience
A 1951 treaty, deepened since 2022, covering the southern approaches to a strait it does not mention.
The recognition that makes every other relationship in this module unofficial.
A state whose economy, tax base and international standing rest on one industry — which is also the reason anyone would fight over it.
Deep interdependence and sharpening security friction, held by the same two governments at the same time.
Expanding technology contact with a partner that will not recognise it, from a bloc aligned on controls but not on defence.
A supply relationship governed by one country's domestic statute, and in 2026 handled as something that could be traded.
The most complete recent case of economic coercion against a democracy — real damage, no policy change, and a quiet wind-back.
A demonstration, aimed at everyone else, that positions taken on Taiwan carry costs for third countries.
A restriction architecture aimed at one country that regulates the industry of another.
A deterrent that is a belief rather than a commitment — which costs nothing to maintain and can be devalued by statements alone.
Descriptive records, not ratings. There is no field anywhere in this layer for relationship strength, warmth, hostility or direction of travel, and none may be added. Change is carried by the validity period, the recorded last material change and the linked events — each of which a reader can check. See the methodology.