本頁部分內容仍以英文正本呈現:相關譯文尚未完成。 英文版本

關係紀錄

亞美尼亞 → 歐亞經濟聯盟

亞美尼亞仍在行使的成員資格,其他四個成員國已要求其將此付諸表決。

機構成員資格 自2015-01-02起

進行中
評估截至
2026-09-08
最後檢視
2026-09-28

評估高信心

這是對安排的描述,而非評等。Vigil不公布任何衡量關係強弱、親疏或敵對程度的指標,本網站上的任何關係都不附分數、趨勢或發展方向。所記錄的是安排涵蓋什麼、始於何時、哪些事件改變了它,以及其中每一項的確立程度。

簡言之

Armenia's membership of the Eurasian Economic Union since January 2015: a customs union and single market with Russia that sets its external tariff and rules out a free-trade agreement with the EU. Since May 2026 the other members have asked Armenia to choose, and a report on suspending it is due in December.

Eurasian Economic Union has as a member Armenia. A directional arrangement: the two parties do not hold the same position in it. Authored once and read from both ends.

安排

狀態
進行中有效且正在運作。不涉及其運作成效,也不涉及其走向。
涵蓋範圍
貿易機構法律與條約經記錄此安排所包含的類別。並非衡量指標:涵蓋較多類別的關係只是描述得更詳細,而非更為牢固。

摘要

Armenia joined the Eurasian Economic Union on 2 January 2015, after abandoning an EU association and free-trade agreement in September 2013 in favour of the Russian-led customs union. Membership gives it a common external tariff set by the Eurasian Economic Commission, duty-free access to the single market — Russia above all — and the right of its citizens to work in member states without permits. It also rules things out: under the Treaty, free-trade regimes with third parties are concluded by the Union, not by its members, which is why the EU partnership agreement Armenia signed in 2017 has no free-trade chapter. Armenia legislated in 2025 to begin an EU accession process, and on 24 August 2026 its prime minister said an application may be made soon. The other four members' answer came first: on 29 May 2026 their presidents called for an Armenian referendum on the EU or the Union, and commissioned a report for the December 2026 Supreme Council on suspending the Treaty's application to Armenia. Armenia has not joined that statement, has lodged no withdrawal, attends the Union's councils and has used its complaint procedure against Russia's 2026 restrictions on Armenian produce.

為何重要

It is the institution through which most of Russia's economic leverage over Armenia is organised. The market Russia restricted in 2026 is the Union's single market, restricted under the Treaty's own sanitary exceptions; the duty-free gas regime Russia threatened in May was agreed as Armenia entered the customs union; and work without permits in Russia is a Union right. Leaving would be Armenia's decision, on twelve months' notice — but what it would cost is set by what membership currently carries, and the December council is the first dated point at which the other members could act.

協議

  • Treaty on the accession of the Republic of Armenia to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union · 簽署於2014-10-10

    In force for Armenia from 2 January 2015. Its annexes set temporary exemptions from the common external tariff, since expired; the exact lines are not carried here.

仍然未知的事項

  • The Treaty provides for withdrawal on a member's own written notice, taking effect twelve months later (Article 118), and contains no procedure for suspending or expelling a member. How the suspension named in the Astana statement would be effected has not been stated by any member.
  • The notice period is recorded from the Treaty: twelve months (Article 118). Armenia's prime minister said on 3 September 2026 that a member must notify the Union six months before deciding; that is his statement, carried as attributed, and no official material has been found that explains the difference.
  • No finding by the Eurasian Economic Commission on Armenia's complaint about the Russian restrictions has been reported, and no case before the Union's court has been found.
  • Whether Armenia would remain inside the customs union while negotiating with the EU, or what order it would take the two steps in, has not been stated beyond the prime minister's remark that a referendum would follow an application.

證據同樣支持的其他解讀

  • Armenia's continued participation can be read as a deliberate choice to keep the Union's benefits until the EU track offers something to replace them, or as the absence of any alternative on the timescale of the dispute. The behaviour is the same under both readings, and so is the outcome: the decision to end the membership has been left to the other side.

列出這些解讀,是因為該紀錄本身的評估並非其來源所允許的唯一評估 — 而不是對上述評估的保留。

此關係涉及的Watch問題

證據經由此關係的常設分析問題,各附最新一次檢視。內容衍生自Watch物件,從不在此重述。

所有高加索關係 在探索中開啟

評估截至 — 2026-09-08 最近檢視 — 2026-09-28