Resolved
0
Latest review

Changed this review 5 questions moved in the current review window — new evidence, a named test met, or a changed assessment. Changes through .

Political

Does Georgia's EU track move from penalised to suspended — or reverse?

The Constitutional Court held procedural hearings on the party-ban suit on 21–23 October and set the substantive phase from 26 October; no ruling. No Union listing, visa, candidacy or funding act, and no Georgian reversal.

Brief itemGeorgia's Constitutional Court rejected the opposition's procedural motions in the party-ban case; substantive hearings begin 26 October, with no ruling

Movement observed
  1. 2026-09-14: Baseline
  2. 2026-09-20: No material change
  3. 2026-09-27: No material change
  4. 2026-10-04: No material change
  5. 2026-10-11: Movement observed
  6. 2026-10-18: Movement observed
  7. 2026-10-25: Movement observed
6 observables

Logistics

Has TRIPP moved from framework and survey into construction?

The National Assembly's Foreign Relations Committee approved the ratification bill 4–1 on 21 October; no plenary vote was reported by 24 October. A Syunik working group on 22 October prepared design work; the deputy prime minister said the railway route has been determined, but no alignment is published, so final-alignment is not met. No contract, construction or customs instrument.

Brief itemTRIPP's ratification bill cleared committee and officials prepared design work in Syunik; it is not ratified, and nothing is built

Movement observed
  1. 2026-09-13: No material change
  2. 2026-09-20: Movement observed
  3. 2026-09-27: No material change
  4. 2026-09-28: Movement observed
  5. 2026-10-04: No material change
  6. 2026-10-11: No material change
  7. 2026-10-18: Movement observed
  8. 2026-10-25: Movement observed
5 observables

Economic

Is Armenia's economic tie to Russia changing by institutional act rather than by pressure and statement?

The report commissioned at Astana was sent to the Supreme Council's members on 20 October under the four heads of government's appeal and published. It concedes the Treaty has no suspension mechanism and names a joint decision under general international law as an option. The council has not met and decided nothing; no gas, application, notice or restriction change.

Brief itemThe other EAEU members' report concedes the Treaty has no way to suspend Armenia, and grounds a joint suspension in general international law

Movement observed
  1. 2026-09-28: Baseline
  2. 2026-10-04: No material change
  3. 2026-10-11: Movement observed
  4. 2026-10-18: No material change
  5. 2026-10-25: Movement observed
5 observables

Also moved2

Watchboard 9 standing questions — the state of each at a glance. Open a row to preview it.

State
Domain

9 questions

Caucasus9 questions5 moved2 quietreviewed
  1. Does Georgia's EU track move from penalised to suspended — or reverse?— Movement observed, reviewed 2026-10-25
  2. Has TRIPP moved from framework and survey into construction?— Movement observed, reviewed 2026-10-25
  3. Is Armenia's economic tie to Russia changing by institutional act rather than by pressure and statement?— Movement observed, reviewed 2026-10-25
  4. Is Armenia's realignment becoming institutional rather than declaratory?— Movement observed, reviewed 2026-10-25
  5. Is Russian integration of the two Georgian entities deepening?— Movement observed, reviewed 2026-10-25
  6. Does the Armenia–Türkiye border open?— No material change, reviewed 2026-10-25
  7. Does the Chechen succession question produce an observable event?— No material change, reviewed 2026-10-25
  8. Has delimitation extended beyond the 2024 Tavush section?— No material change, reviewed 2026-10-25
  9. Has the initialled peace agreement been signed?— No material change, reviewed 2026-10-25

Quiet but important Checked repeatedly and found the same, with a stated reason why the absence matters.

  1. Diplomatic6 reviews without material change

    Does the Armenia–Türkiye border open?

    1. 2026-09-14: Baseline
    2. 2026-09-20: No material change
    3. 2026-09-27: No material change
    4. 2026-10-04: No material change
    5. 2026-10-11: No material change
    6. 2026-10-18: No material change
    7. 2026-10-25: No material change
    Why the absence matters

    Each window in which the checkpoint stands ready and closed is a finding about a decision withheld rather than a capacity lacking, and the run of such windows is the measure of how firmly Ankara holds the border to Baku's timetable.

  2. Political2 reviews without material change

    Does the Chechen succession question produce an observable event?

    1. 2026-09-06: No material change
    2. 2026-09-13: No material change
    3. 2026-09-20: No material change
    4. 2026-09-27: Movement observed
    5. 2026-10-04: No material change
    6. 2026-10-11: Movement observed
    7. 2026-10-18: No material change
    8. 2026-10-25: No material change
    Why the absence matters

    Each quiet review is a finding that a personal arrangement under open discussion of its own end has held for another week, and the length of the run is the one measure the module publishes about it.

Local record tests 3 further entries on the module’s standing watch list that stayed with the conflict record — record-specific tests rather than canonical questions.

3 local entriesrecord-specific tests on the module’s standing watch list
  • Has the Armenia–Türkiye border opened to any category of traveller?

    It has not. The land border has been closed since 1993. Armenia and Türkiye agreed in July 2022, and reaffirmed in 2025, to open it to third-country nationals and holders of diplomatic passports; the Margara crossing on the Armenian side has been reported ready since 2023, and Armenia says it is waiting on Turkish implementation. What has changed is adjacent rather than at the border: Armenia has allowed Azerbaijani lorries bound for Türkiye to transit its territory since late 2025. A first crossing by any category of traveller would be the marker; announcements about readiness have recurred for four years.

  • Are the unresolved human files moving, or hardening?

    The territorial question was closed by force in 2023. The consequences were not, and in 2026 one of them moved in the direction of closure against the displaced rather than toward settlement: a Baku court sentenced fifteen former Karabakh officials in February 2026, five to life imprisonment, with a separate twenty-year sentence for Ruben Vardanyan, and an appeal court upheld the verdicts in August 2026. Neither the initialled treaty nor the Washington declaration commits Azerbaijan to release anyone. The other files — some 4,500 missing recorded by the ICRC, property and return claims, mine clearance measured in decades — are unmoved. Watch any release, any return framework, and whether these files are named in the settlement at all.

  • Are the corridors carrying more, and is any of it new geography?

    The material test of whether the region's diplomacy produces connectivity. Middle Corridor volumes rose steeply after 2022 from a small base and are reported on differing bases in the 4.5–5.2 million tonne range for 2025, with container traffic around 77,000 TEU; the binding constraints are Caspian ferry capacity, port throughput and the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars line, not demand. Azerbaijani gas to the EU was about 12.8 bcm in 2025, essentially flat, against expansion commitments that depend on fields not yet producing. Watch whether growth continues, and separately whether any of it crosses a border that was closed — which is the only kind of increase the settlement would explain.