Israel and the PA dispute the status of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The Oslo interim division of 1995 was never replaced; since 2025 Israeli decisions on land registration, settlement planning and E1 move administration of Area C toward Israeli state bodies, against an ICJ opinion Israel rejects.
對稱的安排:從任一方解讀都相同。撰寫一次,記於一筆紀錄。
安排
- 狀態
- 進行中有效且正在運作。不涉及其運作成效,也不涉及其走向。最近一次實質變化:2026-02-15。
- 涵蓋範圍
- 法律與條約外交機構經記錄此安排所包含的類別。並非衡量指標:涵蓋較多類別的關係只是描述得更詳細,而非更為牢固。
摘要
The PLO and Israel recognised each other in 1993 and deferred borders, Jerusalem and settlements to permanent-status talks that never concluded. The 1995 interim agreement divided the West Bank into Areas A, B and C, with Area C — about 60 per cent — under full Israeli civil and security control; it was meant to last five years and has not been replaced. The ICJ's advisory opinion of 19 July 2024 found Israel's continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territory unlawful (11–4), said it must end "as rapidly as possible", and found that Israel must cease new settlement activity and evacuate settlers (14–1); the opinion is not binding, and Israel rejects it. Israeli decisions since 2025 run the other way: final approval of the E1 plan beside Ma'ale Adumim on 20 August 2025 and a tender for 1,234 units in August 2026; a security-cabinet decision of 11 May 2025 ordering land-title settlement resumed in Area C, and a government decision of 15 February 2026, read in draft, assigning it to the Justice Ministry's registration authority with a target of 15 per cent of unsettled land by 2030; and a reported security-cabinet package of 8 February 2026 on land sales, registers and planning powers. Israel presents these measures as clarifying land rights; the PA, Arab governments and Israeli rights groups describe them as steps toward annexation. Several states recognised the State of Palestine in September 2025; recognition did not change who administers the ground.
為何重要
The interim arrangement's boundaries are the West Bank's operating map — who issues permits, demolishes, registers land and polices — and the current change is administrative rather than declared. Whether Israeli sovereignty bills advance in the Knesset elected on 27 October 2026, and whether the land decisions are implemented by military order, are what would move this relationship.
相關事件
- 相互承認與奧斯陸原則宣言 1993年9月9日 – 13日
外交 · 政治
- 奧斯陸第二號協議將約旦河西岸劃分為A、B、C三區 1995年9月28日
政治 · 領土變化
- 關於以色列屯墾區的第2334號決議 2016年12月23日
Diplomatic · Territorial change
- 國際法院發表諮詢意見:以色列繼續存在於被佔領的巴勒斯坦領土屬違法 2024年7月19日(聯合國大會ES-10/24號決議,2024年9月18日)
Diplomatic · Territorial change
- 以色列在C區重啟土地登記 2026年2月15日(前身決定:2025年5月11日)
Territorial change · Political
仍然未知的事項
- The adopted text and number of the 15 February 2026 decision, and whether the military-order amendments implementing it have been signed, are not established; the decision was read in draft.
- The 8 February 2026 security-cabinet package has no published primary text; its contents are reported.
- The Attorney General kept the E1 tender's 19 October bid deadline but postponed evaluation and award until after the election, according to Israeli press; petitions against the postponement are pending.
- Area shares (A, B, C) are commonly cited figures, not re-measured for this record.
證據同樣支持的其他解讀
- The land and planning measures can be read as administration of territory Israel already controls, as Israel's government presents them, or as annexation by administrative means, as their critics do. The record states the measures and both readings and adopts neither.
列出這些解讀,是因為該紀錄本身的評估並非其來源所允許的唯一評估 — 而不是對上述評估的保留。
此關係涉及的Watch問題
證據經由此關係的常設分析問題,各附最新一次檢視。內容衍生自Watch物件,從不在此重述。
All Levant relationships 在探索中開啟
評估截至 — 2026-10-11 最近檢視 — 2026-10-11