亞美尼亞憲法法院認可TRIPP框架協議，使其可進入批准程序

發生了什麼

亞美尼亞憲法法院於2026年9月15日以書面程序審理涵蓋川普國際和平與繁榮之路的戰略合作框架協議，並於同日裁定其所含義務符合憲法，由Edgar Shatiryan法官擔任報告法官。裁決全文於9月16日公布。由法院審查是批准表決前的標準步驟；該協議現已送交國民議會。亞塞拜然繼續將該路線稱為Zangezur走廊，其外交部長表示，亞美尼亞段的施工預計於2027年初開始；亞美尼亞官員則將TRIPP描述為在亞美尼亞主權與管轄下的公路與鐵路基礎設施。

A CONSTITUTIONAL RULING IS A GATE, NOT A DECISION. What the court decided is that the obligations are capable of being ratified, which removes the one obstacle that could have stopped the agreement without a vote; it decided nothing about whether the National Assembly will ratify, when, or on what terms, and it settled none of the questions the route actually turns on. Those remain what they have been: who controls passage, under whose customs and border regime, and whether the thing being built is a road through a sovereign state or a corridor with reduced sovereign control — a difference the two governments still describe in incompatible words, which is itself the most durable fact in this file. The module records the stage reached and does not read a procedural clearance as momentum. The observable is a ratification vote with a date and a margin, and after it an implementing instrument that says who administers the crossing.

信心：高