本頁部分內容仍以英文正本呈現:相關譯文尚未完成。 英文版本

關係紀錄

阿拉伯聯合大公國 → 美國在海灣

阿聯的駐軍安排——Al Dhafra,以及早於戰爭三十年的國防合作協議。

駐軍安排 自1994年起

進行中
評估截至
2026-09
最後檢視
2026-09-14

評估高信心

這是對安排的描述,而非評等。Vigil不公布任何衡量關係強弱、親疏或敵對程度的指標,本網站上的任何關係都不附分數、趨勢或發展方向。所記錄的是安排涵蓋什麼、始於何時、哪些事件改變了它,以及其中每一項的確立程度。

簡言之

The United Arab Emirates hosts United States air forces at Al Dhafra under bilateral defence cooperation agreements dating from 1994. Vigil records the arrangement as it is publicly described: a standing hosting relationship, older than the war, that the 2026 campaign put under fire on the host's own territory.

The United States in the Gulf maintains a presence hosted by United Arab Emirates. A directional arrangement: the two parties do not hold the same position in it. Authored once and read from both ends.

安排

狀態
進行中有效且正在運作。不涉及其運作成效,也不涉及其走向。最近一次實質變化:2026-02-28。
涵蓋範圍
國防駐地裝備移轉經記錄此安排所包含的類別。並非衡量指標:涵蓋較多類別的關係只是描述得更詳細,而非更為牢固。

摘要

A United States–UAE defence cooperation agreement was signed in 1994 and has been renewed and expanded since; the Al Dhafra base area hosts the 380th Air Expeditionary Wing and has been publicly described by both governments as the principal American air presence in the federation. Through the 2026 war the UAE absorbed nearly half of Iranian launches against the Gulf states, hosted Israeli air-defence systems for the first time, and is the state whose air-defence integration with the United States is furthest advanced. The arrangement is authored here because the Atlas and the Map already carried its two ends without the edge between them. Vigil has not read the agreement text and authors none of its terms.

為何重要

Every forward United States position in this war stands on a host's territory, and the UAE is the host most heavily struck. The relationship explains why the federation's response to the war has been to harden rather than hedge, and it is the arrangement through which the air-defence integration the module's Watch tracks would run.

協議

  • United States–UAE Defense Cooperation Agreement · 簽署於1994-07

    The founding instrument, renewed and expanded in subsequent agreements whose texts are not public. Operative terms are not authored.

相關事件

組織

此關係藉以運作的結構。它們並非關係的當事方——當事方是上方的兩個行為者。

地點

本模組已發布的標記。此紀錄本身不增加任何地理精度。

仍然未知的事項

  • The current text of the cooperation agreement and any status-of-forces terms are not public; the record states that an arrangement exists and what it publicly covers.
  • What the arrangement obliged either party to do when the base area was attacked is not established; the activity series records reported attacks with their basis and nothing about the response.

此關係涉及的Watch問題

證據經由此關係的常設分析問題,各附最新一次檢視。內容衍生自Watch物件,從不在此重述。

所有伊朗–海灣關係 在探索中開啟

評估截至 — 2026-09 最近檢視 — 2026-09-14