A partnership NATO says it can no longer have, with the machinery for one still formally in place and not meeting.
Vigil publishes no measure of how strong or how hostile a relationship is — the description and its evidence are the record.
Participation that is territorial rather than military — and the reason the northern axis is a standing question rather than a closed one.
Bulgaria hosts a battlegroup that Italy leads — the political half of NATO's forward presence, not its command arrangement.
Estonia hosts a battlegroup that the United Kingdom leads — the political half of NATO's forward presence, not its command arrangement.
Finland hosts a battlegroup that Sweden leads — the political half of NATO's forward presence, not its command arrangement.
Latvia hosts a brigade that Canada leads — the political half of NATO's forward presence, not its command arrangement.
Lithuania hosts a brigade that Germany leads — the political half of NATO's forward presence, not its command arrangement.
Poland hosts a battlegroup that the United States leads — the political half of NATO's forward presence, not its command arrangement.
Romania hosts a battlegroup that France leads — the political half of NATO's forward presence, not its command arrangement.
Slovakia hosts a battlegroup that Spain leads — the political half of NATO's forward presence, not its command arrangement.
The bilateral framework for US forces' access to agreed Danish facilities, signed in December 2023 at the entrance to the Baltic Sea.
The 2017 bilateral framework for the presence and activities of US forces in Estonia, signed in the first year of NATO's forward presence.
The bilateral framework for US forces' access to agreed Finnish facilities, signed in December 2023 on the alliance's longest border with Russia.
The bilateral framework for German–Polish defence cooperation signed in Warsaw on 17 June 2026, replacing the 2011 arrangement.
The 2017 bilateral framework for the presence and activities of US forces in Latvia, the first of the three Baltic agreements to be signed.
The 2017 bilateral framework for US forces in Lithuania — and, since 2026, the setting for Lithuania's request for a permanent US base, which no US decision has answered.
The bilateral legal framework under which US forces operate in Poland — and the reason the first permanently stationed US forces on the flank are there.
A twenty-year-old framework for US access to Romanian bases, on the alliance's Black Sea shoulder.
The bilateral framework for US forces' access to agreed Swedish facilities, signed in December 2023 while Sweden's accession was still pending.
A leadership whose survival, energy and export access have all run through Moscow since the protests it did not lose.
Belgium in the alliance since 1949 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Bulgaria in the alliance since 2004 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Canada in the alliance since 1949 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Czechia in the alliance since 1999 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Denmark in the alliance since 1949 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Estonia in the alliance since 2004 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Finland in the alliance since 2023 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
France in the alliance since 1949 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Germany in the alliance since 1955 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Hungary in the alliance since 1999 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Italy in the alliance since 1949 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Latvia in the alliance since 2004 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Lithuania in the alliance since 2004 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Netherlands in the alliance since 1949 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Norway in the alliance since 1949 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Poland in the alliance since 1999 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Romania in the alliance since 2004 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Slovakia in the alliance since 2004 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Spain in the alliance since 1982 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Sweden in the alliance since 2024 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
Türkiye in the alliance since 1952 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
The United Kingdom in the alliance since 1949 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
The United States in the alliance since 1949 — the commitment every other record in this module rests on.
A partnership frozen in 2021 and never ended, with dialogue kept open and nothing practical running through it.
A partnership with a constitutionally neutral state, which NATO says it fully respects — and which is not a step towards membership.
Two organisations with twenty-three members in common, cooperating where the eastern flank's obstacles are regulatory rather than military.
Descriptive records, not ratings. There is no field anywhere in this layer for relationship strength, warmth, hostility or direction of travel, and none may be added. Change is carried by the validity period, the recorded last material change and the linked events — each of which a reader can check. See the methodology.