本頁部分內容仍以英文正本呈現:相關譯文尚未完成。 英文版本

防空

NASAMS

烏克蘭中程防空層的另一半——一種發射空對空飛彈的陸基系統,用於對抗巡弋飛彈與無人機,而非彈道威脅。

NASAMS 挪威、美國 2022 – present in this conflict

狀態截至
2026-10
最後檢視
2026-10-01

評估中等信心

提供辨識背景,而非性能數據表。本目錄涵蓋與Vigil所關注之衝突相關的主要公開記載系統——並非詳盡的戰鬥序列。不記錄任何數量、可用狀況或當前配置。

紀錄 此系統是什麼、源自何處、由誰使用,以及與Vigil的哪些模組相關——並附上每一項所依據的證據。

服役 證據:已證實
剪影 · 未按比例

紀錄

系列NASAMS
衍生型NASAMS 2; NASAMS 3
原產地挪威、美國
製造商Kongsberg / RTX
年代2022 – present in this conflict
出現於Ukraine–Russia · NATO Eastern Flank

衝突關聯性

這是本目錄中此系統的唯一紀錄。它與下方的各模組相關;各模組的Force Atlas會顯示它在該處的使用方式。

使用方

Ukraine: Donated from 2022; no Ukrainian production. · Norway and the eastern flank: The originating operator: Norway's air force has fielded NASAMS since the 1990s and its ministry has contracted further units and modernisation. No holdings or sites recorded. · Lithuania and the eastern flank: Three purchases, kept apart. The first battery was contracted in 2017 and delivered in 2020. A second, ordered in 2023, began arriving with the Air Force's Air Defence Battalion in April 2026, with integration planned by the end of the year, according to public broadcasting. A third was contracted on 3 October 2024 for delivery in 2028, and the government approved a further purchase in April 2025 alongside additional Boxer vehicles. Programme facts only; no fire-unit count or site is recorded. · Netherlands and the eastern flank: In service with the army's ground-based air defence command; no holdings recorded. · Finland and the eastern flank: In Finnish service as the medium-range layer of the ground-based air defence, procured in the 2000s; no holdings recorded. · Spain and the eastern flank: Spain has kept a NASAMS unit in Latvia since June 2022 on rotation; in February 2026, in its eighth rotation, Spain's defence staff described it as fully integrated into NATO's air defence network. No site is recorded. · Hungary and the eastern flank: Contracted in 2020 as the replacement for Soviet-era systems; deliveries announced by the ministry from 2023. Programme facts only.

捐贈方United States, Norway

戰場角色

Medium-range point and area defence, identified in specialist assessment alongside IRIS-T as one of the two principal systems carrying Ukraine's cruise-missile defence. Its distinguishing feature is that it fires air-to-air missiles from the ground, which ties its resupply to a munition stream shared with combat aircraft rather than to a dedicated surface-to-air production line.

優勢

Proven against cruise missiles and drones, and drawing on a widely produced missile family rather than a system-specific interceptor.

限制

Not an anti-ballistic system. Sharing a missile family with fighter aircraft is a supply advantage and a supply exposure at once, because the same rounds are wanted for air-to-air use. As with every donated layer, the binding variable is the interceptor resupply rate rather than the number of launchers, and that rate is not published.

有文件記錄的衝突使用

In documented Ukrainian service since 2022 and consistently described in specialist assessment as a core part of the medium-range layer. No primary source separating delivered systems from planned or pledged systems was identified for NASAMS, and the totals appearing in reporting are therefore not reproduced here. What can be said is that the system is in service; how many are operational is not established. NATO EASTERN FLANK. NASAMS is the most widely held medium-range ground-based air-defence system on the flank — Norwegian by origin, and in service or on order with Lithuania, the Netherlands, Finland and Hungary. It is the system through which the module's air-defence-production economy object reads the same interceptor problem from the allied side: the AMRAAM it fires is also the principal air-to-air missile of the flank's fighter fleets, so one production line serves both. One deployment is published by its contributor: Spain's NASAMS unit in Latvia, on rotation since June 2022, which Spain's defence staff describes as fully integrated into NATO's air defence network — the only allied ground-based unit in the Baltic states for which that is stated. No holdings or sites are stated.

軍種與兵種使用方

有文件記錄的部隊

評估截至 — 2026-10 最近檢視 — 2026-10-01