The open war between the al-Qaeda-aligned coalition and the Islamic State's Sahel province since 2019–20: a rupture over territory, taxation and allegiance in the tri-border zone, fought alongside both movements' wars against the states, and responsible for a large share of the region's civilian killing.
Eine symmetrische Vereinbarung: Sie liest sich von beiden Seiten gleich. Einmal verfasst, in einem Eintrag.
Die Vereinbarung
- Status
- ActiveIn force and operating. Says nothing about how well it is working, or about which way it is heading.Last material change: 2026.
- Was sie umfasst
- VerteidigungKategorien, die die Vereinbarung nachweislich umfasst. Kein Maß: Eine Beziehung, die mehr davon umfasst, ist ausführlicher beschrieben, nicht gefestigter.
Zusammenfassung
The two movements coexisted in the Sahel until 2019, when competition over recruits, zakat and the Ménaka–Liptako corridor turned into fighting. Since 2020 they have contested eastern Mali, western Niger and northern Burkina Faso directly, with the Islamic State province expanding in the Ménaka region and around the tri-border zone and JNIM holding the centre and pressing south. The province's massacres of communities it accuses of supporting its rival, and JNIM's blockades of towns under the province's influence, are among the region's largest documented civilian-harm episodes. The states fight both and have not been able to exploit the division; each movement presents the other as the deviant. There is no known channel between them and no reported attempt at reconciliation.
Warum es wichtig ist
It is why the map of insurgent influence does not read as one front, why the tri-border zone is the region's most lethal for civilians, and why any settlement with JNIM would leave a second war running. It also sets a limit on what either movement can hold: each is fighting on two sides.
Was unbekannt bleibt
- The date the rupture became open fighting is given variously across 2019 and 2020; the record states the year the relationship is generally dated from and no more.
- Attribution of individual massacres between the two movements is contested in some cases and is recorded on the event records, not here.
- Vigil publishes no strength, disposition or area-of-control claim for either party.
Lesarten, die die Belege ebenfalls stützen
- The war between them can be read as ideological — the Islamic State's rejection of al-Qaeda's method — or as a contest for the same resources that would exist under any banner. Observers who follow both draw on each; the record grades the relationship, not the explanation.
Aufgeführt, weil die Einschätzung des Eintrags nicht die einzige ist, die seine Quellen zulassen — nicht als Absicherung der obigen Einschätzung.
Watch-Fragen, für die diese Beziehung relevant ist
Ständige analytische Fragen, deren Belege über diese Beziehung laufen, jeweils mit ihrer letzten Überprüfung. Abgeleitet aus dem Watch-Objekt, hier nie wiederholt.
Alle Beziehungen im Sahel In Erkunden öffnen
Eingeschätzt zum Stand — 2026-08 Zuletzt überprüft — 2026-09-08